From 77fe46131cb07653c00c32c66906a45a09adbfd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lauri Ojansivu Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 09:59:36 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Wekan vs Sandstorm (markdown) --- Wekan-vs-Sandstorm.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Wekan-vs-Sandstorm.md b/Wekan-vs-Sandstorm.md index a715ac9..6700a37 100644 --- a/Wekan-vs-Sandstorm.md +++ b/Wekan-vs-Sandstorm.md @@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ In Wekan, there is ongoing work on on [Themes feature](https://github.com/wekan/wekan/issues/781). -In Sandstorm, you can vote adding [Themes feature](https://github.com/sandstorm-io/sandstorm/issues/1713#issuecomment-301274498) +In Sandstorm, you can vote adding [Themes feature](https://github.com/sandstorm-io/sandstorm/issues/1713#issuecomment-301274498). The user interface in Sandstorm is one Sandstorm's [long list of high-end security features](https://docs.sandstorm.io/en/latest/using/security-practices/) protecting potentially malicious applications running on Sandstorm sandboxes/grains to hijack whole full screen interface and do phishing of information, stealing admin credentials when replacing admin menus, etc. It's black to be totally recognizable and different from other applications. Having it hidden or on not so dark would make new users to not find it. There has been usability testing of Sandstorm's user interface. Sandstorm has been fully security audited and found problems fixes already. \ No newline at end of file