mirror of
https://github.com/evennia/evennia.git
synced 2026-04-04 06:57:16 +02:00
Split out Django-queries into separate tutorial page
This commit is contained in:
parent
c54625b305
commit
21cb3f69c8
3 changed files with 408 additions and 320 deletions
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# Searching for things
|
||||
|
||||
[prev lesson](Creating-Things) | [next lesson]()
|
||||
[prev lesson](Creating-Things) | [next lesson](Django-queries)
|
||||
|
||||
We have gone through how to create the various entities in Evennia. But creating something is of little use
|
||||
if we cannot find and use it afterwards.
|
||||
|
|
@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ The base tools are the `evennia.search_*` functions, such as `evennia.search_obj
|
|||
```sidebar:: Querysets
|
||||
|
||||
What is returned from the main search functions is actually a `queryset`. They can be
|
||||
treated like lists except that they can't modified in-place. We'll discuss querysets at
|
||||
the end of this lesson.
|
||||
treated like lists except that they can't modified in-place. We'll discuss querysets in
|
||||
the `next lesson` <Django-queries>`_.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Strings are always case-insensitive, so searching for `"rose"`, `"Rose"` or `"rOsE"` give the same results.
|
||||
|
|
@ -253,324 +253,13 @@ There is a property `.destination` which is only used by exits:
|
|||
- `door.destination` is `outside` (or wherever the door leads)
|
||||
- `room.destination` is `None` (same for all the other non-exit objects)
|
||||
|
||||
## Database queries
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
The search functions and methods above are enough for most cases. But sometimes you need to be
|
||||
more specific:
|
||||
Knowing how to find things is important and the tools from this section will serve you well. For most of your needs
|
||||
these tools will be all you need ...
|
||||
|
||||
- You want to find all `Characters` ...
|
||||
- ... who are in Rooms tagged as `moonlit` ...
|
||||
- ... _and_ who has the Attribute `lycantrophy` with a level higher than 2 ...
|
||||
- ... because they'll immediately become werewolves!
|
||||
... but not always. In the next lesson we will dive further into more complex searching when we start looking at
|
||||
Django queries and querysets in earnest.
|
||||
|
||||
In principle you could achieve this with the existing search functions combined with a lot of loops
|
||||
and if statements. But for something non-standard like this querying the database directly will be
|
||||
more efficient.
|
||||
[prev lesson](Creating-Things) | [next lesson](Django-queries)
|
||||
|
||||
A [django queryset](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/ref/models/querysets/) represents
|
||||
a database query. One can add querysets together to build ever-more complicated queries. Only when
|
||||
you are trying to use the results of the queryset will it actually call the database.
|
||||
|
||||
The normal way to build a queryset is to define what class of entity you want to search by getting its
|
||||
`.objects` resource, and then call various methods on that. We've seen this one before:
|
||||
|
||||
all_weapons = Weapon.objects.all()
|
||||
|
||||
This is now a queryset representing all instances of `Weapon`. If `Weapon` had a subclass `Cannon` and we
|
||||
only wanted the cannons, we would do
|
||||
|
||||
all_cannons = Cannon.objects.all()
|
||||
|
||||
Note that `Weapon` and `Cannon` are different typeclasses. You won't find any `Cannon` instances in
|
||||
the `all_weapon` result above, confusing as that may sound. To get instances of a Typeclass _and_ the
|
||||
instances of all its children classes you need to use `_family`:
|
||||
|
||||
```sidebar:: _family
|
||||
|
||||
The all_family, filter_family etc is an Evennia-specific
|
||||
thing. It's not part of regular Django.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
really_all_weapons = Weapon.objects.all_family()
|
||||
|
||||
This result now contains both `Weapon` and `Cannon` instances.
|
||||
|
||||
To actually limit your search by other criteria than the Typeclass you need to use `.filter`
|
||||
(or `.filter_family`) instead:
|
||||
|
||||
roses = Flower.objects.filter(db_key="rose")
|
||||
|
||||
This is a queryset representing all objects having a `db_key` equal to `"rose"`.
|
||||
Since this is a queryset you can keep adding to it:
|
||||
|
||||
local_roses = roses.filter(db_location=myroom)
|
||||
|
||||
We could also have written this in one statement:
|
||||
|
||||
local_roses = Flower.objects.filter(db_key="rose", db_location=myroom)
|
||||
|
||||
We can also `.exclude` something from results
|
||||
|
||||
local_non_red_roses = local_roses.exclude(db_key="red_rose")
|
||||
|
||||
Only until we actually try to examine the result will the database be called. Here it's called when we
|
||||
try to loop over the queryset:
|
||||
|
||||
for rose in local_non_red_roses:
|
||||
print(rose)
|
||||
|
||||
From now on, the queryset is _evaluated_ and we can't keep adding more queries to it - we'd need to
|
||||
create a new queryset if we wanted to find some other result.
|
||||
|
||||
Note how we use `db_key` and `db_location`. This is the actual names of these database fields. By convention
|
||||
Evennia uses `db_` in front of every database field, but when you access it in Python you can skip the `db_`. This
|
||||
is why you can use `obj.key` and `obj.location` in normal code. Here we are calling the database directly though
|
||||
and need to use the 'real' names.
|
||||
|
||||
Here are the most commonly used methods to use with the `objects` managers:
|
||||
|
||||
- `filter` - query for a listing of objects based on search criteria. Gives empty queryset if none
|
||||
were found.
|
||||
- `get` - query for a single match - raises exception if none were found, or more than one was
|
||||
found.
|
||||
- `all` - get all instances of the particular type.
|
||||
- `filter_family` - like `filter`, but search all sub classes as well.
|
||||
- `get_family` - like `get`, but search all sub classes as well.
|
||||
- `all_family` - like `all`, but return entities of all subclasses as well.
|
||||
|
||||
> All of Evennia search functions use querysets under the hood. The `evennia.search_*` functions actually
|
||||
> return querysets, which means you could in principle keep adding queries to their results as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Queryset field lookups
|
||||
|
||||
Above we found roses with exactly the `db_key` `"rose"`. This is an _exact_ match that is _case sensitive_,
|
||||
so it would not find `"Rose"`.
|
||||
|
||||
# this is case-sensitive and the same as =
|
||||
roses = Flower.objects.filter(db_key__exact="rose"
|
||||
# the i means it's case-insensitive
|
||||
roses = Flower.objects.filter(db_key__iequals="rose")
|
||||
|
||||
The Django field query language uses `__` in the same way as Python uses `.` to access resources. This
|
||||
is because `.` is not allowed in a function keyword.
|
||||
|
||||
roses = Flower.objects.filter(db_key__icontains="rose")
|
||||
|
||||
This will find all flowers whose name contains the string `"rose"`, like `"roses"`, `"wild rose"` etc. The
|
||||
`i` in the beginning makes the search case-insensitive. Other useful variations to use
|
||||
are `__istartswith` and `__iendswith`. You can also use `__gt`, `__ge` for "greater-than"/"greater-or-equal-than"
|
||||
comparisons (same for `__lt` and `__le`). There is also `__in`:
|
||||
|
||||
swords = Weapons.objects.filter(db_key__in=("rapier", "two-hander", "shortsword"))
|
||||
|
||||
For more field lookups, see the
|
||||
[django docs](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/ref/models/querysets/#field-lookups) on the subject.
|
||||
|
||||
### Get that werewolf ...
|
||||
|
||||
Let's see if we can make a query for the werewolves in the moonlight we mentioned at the beginning
|
||||
of this section.
|
||||
|
||||
Firstly, we make ourselves and our current location match the criteria, so we can test:
|
||||
|
||||
> py here.tags.add("moonlit")
|
||||
> py me.db.lycantrophy = 3
|
||||
|
||||
This is an example of a more complex query. We'll consider it an example of what is
|
||||
possible.
|
||||
|
||||
```sidebar:: Line breaks
|
||||
|
||||
Note the way of writing this code. It would have been very hard to read if we just wrote it in
|
||||
one long line. But since we wrapped it in `(...)` we can spread it out over multiple lines
|
||||
without worrying about line breaks!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from typeclasses.characters import Character
|
||||
|
||||
will_transform = (
|
||||
Character.objects
|
||||
.filter(
|
||||
db_location__db_tags__db_key__iexact="moonlit",
|
||||
db_attributes__db_key="lycantrophy",
|
||||
db_attributes__db_value__gt=2)
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- **Line 3** - We want to find `Character`s, so we access `.objects` on the `Character` typeclass.
|
||||
- **Line 4** - We start to filter ...
|
||||
- **Line 5**
|
||||
- ... by accessing the `db_location` field (usually this is a Room)
|
||||
- ... and on that location, we get the value of `db_tags` (this is a _many-to-many_ database field
|
||||
that we can treat like an object for this purpose; it references all Tags on the location)
|
||||
- ... and from those `Tags`, we looking for `Tags` whose `db_key` is "monlit" (non-case sensitive).
|
||||
- **Line 6** - ... We also want only Characters with `Attributes` whose `db_key` is exactly `"lycantrophy"`
|
||||
- **Line 7** - ... at the same time as the `Attribute`'s `db_value` is greater-than 2.
|
||||
|
||||
Running this query makes our newly lycantrrophic Character appear in `will_transform`. Success!
|
||||
|
||||
> Don't confuse database fields with [Attributes](../../../Component/Attributes) you set via `obj.db.attr = 'foo'` or
|
||||
`obj.attributes.add()`. Attributes are custom database entities *linked* to an object. They are not
|
||||
separate fields *on* that object like `db_key` or `db_location` are.
|
||||
|
||||
### Complex queries
|
||||
|
||||
All examples so far used `AND` relations. The arguments to `.filter` are added together with `AND`
|
||||
("we want tag room to be "monlit" _and_ lycantrhopy be > 2").
|
||||
|
||||
For queries using `OR` and `NOT` we need Django's
|
||||
[Q object](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/topics/db/queries/#complex-lookups-with-q-objects). It is
|
||||
import from Django directly:
|
||||
|
||||
from django.db.models import Q
|
||||
|
||||
`Q()` objects take the same arguments like `.filter`:
|
||||
|
||||
Q(db_key="foo")
|
||||
|
||||
The special thing is that these `Q` objects can then be chained together with special symbols:
|
||||
`|` for `OR`, `&` for `AND`. A tilde `~` in front negates the expression inside the `Q` and thus works like `NOT`.
|
||||
|
||||
Let us expand our original werewolf query. Not only do we want to find all Characters in a moonlit room
|
||||
with a certain level of `lycanthrophy`. Now we also want the full moon to immediately transform people who were
|
||||
recently bitten, even if their `lycantrophy` level is not yet high enough (more dramatic this way!). Let's say there is
|
||||
a Tag "recently_bitten" that controls this.
|
||||
|
||||
This is how we'd change our query:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from django.db.models import Q
|
||||
|
||||
will_transform = (
|
||||
|
||||
Character.objects
|
||||
.filter(
|
||||
Q(db_location__db_tags__db_key__iexact="moonlit")
|
||||
& (
|
||||
Q(db_attributes__db_key="lycantrophy",
|
||||
db_attributes__db_value__gt=2)
|
||||
| Q(db__tags__db__key__iexact="recently_bitten")
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
We now grouped the filter
|
||||
|
||||
In our original Lycanthrope example we wanted our werewolves to have names that could start with any
|
||||
vowel except for the specific beginning "ab".
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from django.db.models import Q
|
||||
from typeclasses.characters import Character
|
||||
|
||||
query = Q()
|
||||
for letter in ("aeiouy"):
|
||||
query |= Q(db_key__istartswith=letter)
|
||||
query &= ~Q(db_key__istartswith="ab")
|
||||
query = Character.objects.filter(query)
|
||||
|
||||
list_of_lycanthropes = list(query)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
In the above example, we construct our query our of several Q objects that each represent one part
|
||||
of the query. We iterate over the list of vowels, and add an `OR` condition to the query using `|=`
|
||||
(this is the same idea as using `+=` which may be more familiar). Each `OR` condition checks that
|
||||
the name starts with one of the valid vowels. Afterwards, we add (using `&=`) an `AND` condition
|
||||
that is negated with the `~` symbol. In other words we require that any match should *not* start
|
||||
with the string "ab". Note that we don't actually hit the database until we convert the query to a
|
||||
list at the end (we didn't need to do that either, but could just have kept the query until we
|
||||
needed to do something with the matches).
|
||||
|
||||
### Annotations and `F` objects
|
||||
|
||||
What if we wanted to filter on some condition that isn't represented easily by a field on the
|
||||
object? Maybe we want to find rooms only containing five or more objects?
|
||||
|
||||
We *could* retrieve all interesting candidates and run them through a for-loop to get and count
|
||||
their `.content` properties. We'd then just return a list of only those objects with enough
|
||||
contents. It would look something like this (note: don't actually do this!):
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# probably not a good idea to do it this way
|
||||
|
||||
from typeclasses.rooms import Room
|
||||
|
||||
queryset = Room.objects.all() # get all Rooms
|
||||
rooms = [room for room in queryset if len(room.contents) >= 5]
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Once the number of rooms in your game increases, this could become quite expensive. Additionally, in
|
||||
some particular contexts, like when using the web features of Evennia, you must have the result as a
|
||||
queryset in order to use it in operations, such as in Django's admin interface when creating list
|
||||
filters.
|
||||
|
||||
Enter [F objects](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/ref/models/expressions/#f-expressions) and
|
||||
*annotations*. So-called F expressions allow you to do a query that looks at a value of each object
|
||||
in the database, while annotations allow you to calculate and attach a value to a query. So, let's
|
||||
do the same example as before directly in the database:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from typeclasses.rooms import Room
|
||||
from django.db.models import Count
|
||||
|
||||
room_count = Room.objects.annotate(num_objects=Count('locations_set'))
|
||||
queryset = room_count.filter(num_objects__gte=5)
|
||||
|
||||
rooms = (Room.objects.annotate(num_objects=Count('locations_set'))
|
||||
.filter(num_objects__gte=5))
|
||||
|
||||
rooms = list(rooms)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Here we first create an annotation `num_objects` of type `Count`, which is a Django class. Note that
|
||||
use of `location_set` in that `Count`. The `*_set` is a back-reference automatically created by
|
||||
Django. In this case it allows you to find all objects that *has the current object as location*.
|
||||
Once we have those, they are counted.
|
||||
Next we filter on this annotation, using the name `num_objects` as something we can filter for. We
|
||||
use `num_objects__gte=5` which means that `num_objects` should be greater than 5. This is a little
|
||||
harder to get one's head around but much more efficient than lopping over all objects in Python.
|
||||
|
||||
What if we wanted to compare two parameters against one another in a query? For example, what if
|
||||
instead of having 5 or more objects, we only wanted objects that had a bigger inventory than they
|
||||
had tags? Here an F-object comes in handy:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from django.db.models import Count, F
|
||||
from typeclasses.rooms import Room
|
||||
|
||||
result = (Room.objects.annotate(num_objects=Count('locations_set'),
|
||||
num_tags=Count('db_tags'))
|
||||
.filter(num_objects__gt=F('num_tags')))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
F-objects allows for wrapping an annotated structure on the right-hand-side of the expression. It
|
||||
will be evaluated on-the-fly as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Grouping By and Values
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose you used tags to mark someone belonging an organization. Now you want to make a list and
|
||||
need to get the membership count of every organization all at once. That's where annotations and the
|
||||
`.values_list` queryset method come in. Values/Values Lists are an alternate way of returning a
|
||||
queryset - instead of objects, you get a list of dicts or tuples that hold selected properties from
|
||||
the the matches. It also allows you a way to 'group up' queries for returning information. For
|
||||
example, to get a display about each tag per Character and the names of the tag:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
result = (Character.objects.filter(db_tags__db_category="organization")
|
||||
.values_list('db_tags__db_key')
|
||||
.annotate(cnt=Count('id'))
|
||||
.order_by('-cnt'))
|
||||
```
|
||||
The result queryset will be a list of tuples ordered in descending order by the number of matches,
|
||||
in a format like the following:
|
||||
```
|
||||
[('Griatch Fanclub', 3872), ("Chainsol's Ainneve Testers", 2076), ("Blaufeuer's Whitespace Fixers",
|
||||
1903),
|
||||
("Volund's Bikeshed Design Crew", 1764), ("Tehom's Misanthropes", 1)]
|
||||
|
||||
[prev lesson](Creating-Things) | [next lesson]()
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue