<h1>Permissions<aclass="headerlink"href="#permissions"title="Permalink to this headline">¶</a></h1>
<p>A <em>permission</em> is simply a text string stored in the handler <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">permissions</span></code> on <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Objects</span></code>
and <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Accounts</span></code>. Think of it as a specialized sort of <aclass="reference internal"href="Tags.html"><spanclass="doc">Tag</span></a> - one specifically dedicated
hierarchies. It is set by the <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">perm</span></code> command and checked by the
<codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">PermissionHandler.check</span></code> method as well as by the specially the <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">perm()</span></code> and
<p>Note the use of the <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">/account</span></code> switch. It means you assign the permission to the
<aclass="reference internal"href="Accounts.html"><spanclass="doc">Accounts</span></a> Tommy instead of any <aclass="reference internal"href="Objects.html"><spanclass="doc">Character</span></a> that also
happens to be named “Tommy”.</p>
<p>There can be reasons for putting permissions on Objects (especially NPCS), but
for granting powers to players, you should usually put the permission on the
<codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Account</span></code> - this guarantees that they are kept, <em>regardless</em>
of which Character they are currently puppeting. This is especially important to
remember when assigning permissions from the <em>hierarchy tree</em> (see below), as an
Account’s permissions will overrule that of its character. So to be sure to
avoid confusion you should generally put hierarchy permissions on the Account,
not on their Characters (but see also <aclass="reference external"href="Components/Locks.html#Quelling">quelling</a>).</p>
<p>In code, you add/remove Permissions via the <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">PermissionHandler</span></code>, which sits on all
typeclassed entities as the property <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">.permissions</span></code>:</p>
<h2>The permission hierarchy<aclass="headerlink"href="#the-permission-hierarchy"title="Permalink to this headline">¶</a></h2>
<p>Selected permission strings can be organized in a <em>permission hierarchy</em> by editing the tuple
<codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">settings.PERMISSION_HIERARCHY</span></code>. Evennia’s default permission hierarchy is as follows
(in increasing order of power):</p>
<divclass="highlight-default notranslate"><divclass="highlight"><pre><span></span><spanclass="n">Player</span><spanclass="c1"># can chat and send tells (default level) (lowest)</span>
<spanclass="n">Helper</span><spanclass="c1"># can edit help files</span>
<spanclass="n">Builder</span><spanclass="c1"># can edit the world</span>
<spanclass="n">Admin</span><spanclass="c1"># can administrate accounts</span>
<spanclass="n">Developer</span><spanclass="c1"># like superuser but affected by locks (highest)</span>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>(Besides being case-insensitive, hierarchical permissions also understand the
plural form, so you could use <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Developers</span></code> and <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Developer</span></code> interchangeably).</p>
<blockquote>
<div><p>There is also a <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Guest</span></code> level below <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Player</span></code> that is only active if <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">settings.GUEST_ENABLED</span></code> is
set. The Guest is is never part of <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">settings.PERMISSION_HIERARCHY</span></code>.</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p>When checking a hierarchical permission (using one of the methods to follow),
you will pass checks for your level and all <em>below</em> you. That is, even if the
check explicitly checks for “Builder” level access, you will actually pass if you have
one of “Builder”, “Admin” or “Developer”. By contrast, if you check for a
non-hierarchical permission, like “Blacksmith” you <em>must</em> have exactly
that permission to pass.</p>
</section>
<sectionid="checking-permissions">
<h2>Checking permissions<aclass="headerlink"href="#checking-permissions"title="Permalink to this headline">¶</a></h2>
<p>It’s important to note that you check for the permission of a <em>puppeted</em>
<aclass="reference internal"href="Objects.html"><spanclass="doc">Object</span></a> (like a Character), the check will always first use the
permissions of any <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Account</span></code> connected to that Object before checking for
permissions on the Object. In the case of hierarchical permissions (Admins,
Builders etc), the Account permission will always be used (this stops an Account
from escalating their permission by puppeting a high-level Character). If the
permission looked for is not in the hierarchy, an exact match is required, first
on the Account and if not found there (or if no Account is connected), then on
the Object itself.</p>
<sectionid="checking-with-obj-permissions-check">
<h3>Checking with obj.permissions.check()<aclass="headerlink"href="#checking-with-obj-permissions-check"title="Permalink to this headline">¶</a></h3>
<p>The simplest way to check if an entity has a permission is to check its
<em>PermissionHandler</em>, stored as <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">.permissions</span></code> on all typeclassed entities.</p>
Don't confuse `.permissions.check()` with `.permissions.has()`. The .has()
method checks if a string is defined specifically on that PermissionHandler.
It will not consider permission-hierarchy, puppeting etc. `.has` can be useful
if you are manipulating permissions, but use `.check` for access checking.
</pre></div>
</td></tr></table></div>
</section>
<sectionid="lock-funcs">
<h3>Lock funcs<aclass="headerlink"href="#lock-funcs"title="Permalink to this headline">¶</a></h3>
<p>While the <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">PermissionHandler</span></code> offers a simple way to check perms, <aclass="reference internal"href="Locks.html"><spanclass="doc">Lock
strings</span></a> offers a mini-language for describing how something is accessed.
The <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">perm()</span></code><em>lock function</em> is the main tool for using Permissions in locks.</p>
<p>Let’s say we have a <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">red_key</span></code> object. We also have red chests that we want to
<spanclass="normal">14</span></pre></div></td><tdclass="code"><divclass="highlight"><pre><span></span><spanclass="c1"># in some typeclass file where chest is defined</span>
<spanclass="n">who</span><spanclass="o">.</span><spanclass="n">msg</span><spanclass="p">(</span><spanclass="s2">"The key does not fit!"</span><spanclass="p">)</span>
<p>There are several variations to the default <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">perm</span></code> lockfunc:</p>
<ulclass="simple">
<li><p><codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">perm_above</span></code> - requires a hierarchical permission <em>higher</em> than the one
<li><p><codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">pperm</span></code> - looks <em>only</em> for permissions on <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">Accounts</span></code>, never at any puppeted
objects (regardless of hierarchical perm or not).</p></li>
<li><p><codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">pperm_above</span></code> - like <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">perm_above</span></code>, but for Accounts only.</p></li>
</ul>
</section>
<sectionid="some-examples">
<h3>Some examples<aclass="headerlink"href="#some-examples"title="Permalink to this headline">¶</a></h3>
<spanclass="n">account</span><spanclass="o">.</span><spanclass="n">locks</span><spanclass="o">.</span><spanclass="n">add</span><spanclass="p">(</span><spanclass="s2">"enter:perm_above(Player) and perm(cool_guy)"</span><spanclass="p">)</span>
<spanclass="n">account</span><spanclass="o">.</span><spanclass="n">access</span><spanclass="p">(</span><spanclass="n">obj1</span><spanclass="p">,</span><spanclass="s2">"enter"</span><spanclass="p">)</span><spanclass="c1"># this returns True!</span>
<spanclass="n">obj2</span><spanclass="o">.</span><spanclass="n">locks</span><spanclass="o">.</span><spanclass="n">add</span><spanclass="p">(</span><spanclass="s2">"enter:perm_above(Accounts) and perm(cool_guy)"</span><spanclass="p">)</span>
<spanclass="n">obj2</span><spanclass="o">.</span><spanclass="n">access</span><spanclass="p">(</span><spanclass="n">puppet</span><spanclass="p">,</span><spanclass="s2">"enter"</span><spanclass="p">)</span><spanclass="c1"># this returns False, since puppet permission</span>
<spanclass="c1"># is lower than Account's perm, and perm takes</span>
<p>The <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">quell</span></code> command can be used to enforce the <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">perm()</span></code> lockfunc to ignore
permissions on the Account and instead use the permissions on the Character
only. This can be used e.g. by staff to test out things with a lower permission
level. Return to the normal operation with <codeclass="docutils literal notranslate"><spanclass="pre">unquell</span></code>. Note that quelling will
use the smallest of any hierarchical permission on the Account or Character, so
one cannot escalate one’s Account permission by quelling to a high-permission
Character. Also the superuser can quell their powers this way, making them
