🏗️ feat: Dynamic MCP Server Infrastructure with Access Control (#10787)

* Feature: Dynamic MCP Server with Full UI Management

* 🚦 feat: Add MCP Connection Status icons to MCPBuilder panel (#10805)

* feature: Add MCP server connection status icons to MCPBuilder panel

* refactor: Simplify MCPConfigDialog rendering in MCPBuilderPanel

---------

Co-authored-by: Atef Bellaaj <slalom.bellaaj@external.daimlertruck.com>
Co-authored-by: Danny Avila <danny@librechat.ai>

* fix: address code review feedback for MCP server management

- Fix OAuth secret preservation to avoid mutating input parameter
  by creating a merged config copy in ServerConfigsDB.update()

- Improve error handling in getResourcePermissionsMap to propagate
  critical errors instead of silently returning empty Map

- Extract duplicated MCP server filter logic by exposing selectableServers
  from useMCPServerManager hook and using it in MCPSelect component

* test: Update PermissionService tests to throw errors on invalid resource types

- Changed the test for handling invalid resource types to ensure it throws an error instead of returning an empty permissions map.
- Updated the expectation to check for the specific error message when an invalid resource type is provided.

* feat: Implement retry logic for MCP server creation to handle race conditions

- Enhanced the createMCPServer method to include retry logic with exponential backoff for handling duplicate key errors during concurrent server creation.
- Updated tests to verify that all concurrent requests succeed and that unique server names are generated.
- Added a helper function to identify MongoDB duplicate key errors, improving error handling during server creation.

* refactor: StatusIcon to use CircleCheck for connected status

- Replaced the PlugZap icon with CircleCheck in the ConnectedStatusIcon component to better represent the connected state.
- Ensured consistent icon usage across the component for improved visual clarity.

* test: Update AccessControlService tests to throw errors on invalid resource types

- Modified the test for invalid resource types to ensure it throws an error with a specific message instead of returning an empty permissions map.
- This change enhances error handling and improves test coverage for the AccessControlService.

* fix: Update error message for missing server name in MCP server retrieval

- Changed the error message returned when the server name is not provided from 'MCP ID is required' to 'Server name is required' for better clarity and accuracy in the API response.

---------

Co-authored-by: Atef Bellaaj <slalom.bellaaj@external.daimlertruck.com>
Co-authored-by: Danny Avila <danny@librechat.ai>
This commit is contained in:
Atef Bellaaj 2025-12-04 21:37:23 +01:00 committed by Danny Avila
parent 41c0a96d39
commit 99f8bd2ce6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: BF31EEB2C5CA0956
103 changed files with 7978 additions and 1003 deletions

View file

@ -679,4 +679,276 @@ describe('AclEntry Model Tests', () => {
expect(effective).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW);
});
});
describe('Batch Permission Queries', () => {
test('should get effective permissions for multiple resources in single query', async () => {
const resource1 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
const resource2 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
const resource3 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
/** Grant different permissions to different resources */
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource1,
PermissionBits.VIEW,
grantedById,
);
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource2,
PermissionBits.VIEW | PermissionBits.EDIT,
grantedById,
);
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.GROUP,
groupId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource3,
PermissionBits.DELETE,
grantedById,
);
/** Get permissions for all resources */
const permissionsMap = await methods.getEffectivePermissionsForResources(
[{ principalType: PrincipalType.USER, principalId: userId }],
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
[resource1, resource2, resource3],
);
expect(permissionsMap.size).toBe(2); // Only resource1 and resource2 for user
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource1.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW);
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource2.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW | PermissionBits.EDIT);
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource3.toString())).toBeUndefined(); // User has no access
});
test('should combine permissions from multiple principals in batch query', async () => {
const resource1 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
const resource2 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
/** User has VIEW on both resources */
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource1,
PermissionBits.VIEW,
grantedById,
);
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource2,
PermissionBits.VIEW,
grantedById,
);
/** Group has EDIT on resource1 */
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.GROUP,
groupId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource1,
PermissionBits.EDIT,
grantedById,
);
/** Get combined permissions for user + group */
const permissionsMap = await methods.getEffectivePermissionsForResources(
[
{ principalType: PrincipalType.USER, principalId: userId },
{ principalType: PrincipalType.GROUP, principalId: groupId },
],
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
[resource1, resource2],
);
expect(permissionsMap.size).toBe(2);
/** Resource1 should have VIEW | EDIT (from user + group) */
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource1.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW | PermissionBits.EDIT);
/** Resource2 should have only VIEW (from user) */
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource2.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW);
});
test('should handle empty resource list', async () => {
const permissionsMap = await methods.getEffectivePermissionsForResources(
[{ principalType: PrincipalType.USER, principalId: userId }],
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
[],
);
expect(permissionsMap.size).toBe(0);
});
test('should handle resources with no permissions', async () => {
const resource1 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
const resource2 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
/** Only grant permission to resource1 */
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource1,
PermissionBits.VIEW,
grantedById,
);
const permissionsMap = await methods.getEffectivePermissionsForResources(
[{ principalType: PrincipalType.USER, principalId: userId }],
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
[resource1, resource2], // resource2 has no permissions
);
expect(permissionsMap.size).toBe(1);
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource1.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW);
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource2.toString())).toBeUndefined();
});
test('should include public permissions in batch query', async () => {
const resource1 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
const resource2 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
/** User has VIEW on resource1 */
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource1,
PermissionBits.VIEW | PermissionBits.EDIT,
grantedById,
);
/** Public has VIEW on resource2 */
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.PUBLIC,
null,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource2,
PermissionBits.VIEW,
grantedById,
);
/** Query with user + public principals */
const permissionsMap = await methods.getEffectivePermissionsForResources(
[
{ principalType: PrincipalType.USER, principalId: userId },
{ principalType: PrincipalType.PUBLIC },
],
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
[resource1, resource2],
);
expect(permissionsMap.size).toBe(2);
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource1.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW | PermissionBits.EDIT);
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource2.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW);
});
test('should handle large batch efficiently', async () => {
/** Create 50 resources with various permissions */
const resources = Array.from({ length: 50 }, () => new mongoose.Types.ObjectId());
/** Grant permissions to first 30 resources */
for (let i = 0; i < 30; i++) {
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resources[i],
PermissionBits.VIEW,
grantedById,
);
}
/** Grant group permissions to resources 20-40 (overlap with user) */
for (let i = 20; i < 40; i++) {
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.GROUP,
groupId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resources[i],
PermissionBits.EDIT,
grantedById,
);
}
const startTime = Date.now();
const permissionsMap = await methods.getEffectivePermissionsForResources(
[
{ principalType: PrincipalType.USER, principalId: userId },
{ principalType: PrincipalType.GROUP, principalId: groupId },
],
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resources,
);
const duration = Date.now() - startTime;
/** Should be reasonably fast (under 1 second for 50 resources) */
expect(duration).toBeLessThan(1000);
/** Verify results */
expect(permissionsMap.size).toBe(40); // Resources 0-39 have permissions
/** Resources 0-19: USER VIEW only */
for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
expect(permissionsMap.get(resources[i].toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW);
}
/** Resources 20-29: USER VIEW | GROUP EDIT */
for (let i = 20; i < 30; i++) {
expect(permissionsMap.get(resources[i].toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW | PermissionBits.EDIT);
}
/** Resources 30-39: GROUP EDIT only */
for (let i = 30; i < 40; i++) {
expect(permissionsMap.get(resources[i].toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.EDIT);
}
/** Resources 40-49: No permissions */
for (let i = 40; i < 50; i++) {
expect(permissionsMap.get(resources[i].toString())).toBeUndefined();
}
});
test('should handle mixed ObjectId and string resource IDs', async () => {
const resource1 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
const resource2 = new mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource1,
PermissionBits.VIEW,
grantedById,
);
await methods.grantPermission(
PrincipalType.USER,
userId,
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
resource2,
PermissionBits.EDIT,
grantedById,
);
/** Pass mix of ObjectId and string */
const permissionsMap = await methods.getEffectivePermissionsForResources(
[{ principalType: PrincipalType.USER, principalId: userId }],
ResourceType.MCPSERVER,
[resource1, resource2.toString()], // Mix of ObjectId and string
);
expect(permissionsMap.size).toBe(2);
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource1.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.VIEW);
expect(permissionsMap.get(resource2.toString())).toBe(PermissionBits.EDIT);
});
});
});