mirror of
https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat.git
synced 2025-12-20 18:30:15 +01:00
🏪 feat: Agent Marketplace
bugfix: Enhance Agent and AgentCategory schemas with new fields for category, support contact, and promotion status refactored and moved agent category methods and schema to data-schema package 🔧 fix: Merge and Rebase Conflicts - Move AgentCategory from api/models to @packages/data-schemas structure - Add schema, types, methods, and model following codebase conventions - Implement auto-seeding of default categories during AppService startup - Update marketplace controller to use new data-schemas methods - Remove old model file and standalone seed script refactor: unify agent marketplace to single endpoint with cursor pagination - Replace multiple marketplace routes with unified /marketplace endpoint - Add query string controls: category, search, limit, cursor, promoted, requiredPermission - Implement cursor-based pagination replacing page-based system - Integrate ACL permissions for proper access control - Fix ObjectId constructor error in Agent model - Update React components to use unified useGetMarketplaceAgentsQuery hook - Enhance type safety and remove deprecated useDynamicAgentQuery - Update tests for new marketplace architecture -Known issues: see more button after category switching + Unit tests feat: add icon property to ProcessedAgentCategory interface - Add useMarketplaceAgentsInfiniteQuery and useGetAgentCategoriesQuery to client/src/data-provider/Agents/ - Replace manual pagination in AgentGrid with infinite query pattern - Update imports to use local data provider instead of librechat-data-provider - Add proper permission handling with PERMISSION_BITS.VIEW/EDIT constants - Improve agent access control by adding requiredPermission validation in backend - Remove manual cursor/state management in favor of infinite query built-ins - Maintain existing search and category filtering functionality refactor: consolidate agent marketplace endpoints into main agents API and improve data management consistency - Remove dedicated marketplace controller and routes, merging functionality into main agents v1 API - Add countPromotedAgents function to Agent model for promoted agents count - Enhance getListAgents handler with marketplace filtering (category, search, promoted status) - Move getAgentCategories from marketplace to v1 controller with same functionality - Update agent mutations to invalidate marketplace queries and handle multiple permission levels - Improve cache management by updating all agent query variants (VIEW/EDIT permissions) - Consolidate agent data access patterns for better maintainability and consistency - Remove duplicate marketplace route definitions and middleware selected view only agents injected in the drop down fix: remove minlength validation for support contact name in agent schema feat: add validation and error messages for agent name in AgentConfig and AgentPanel fix: update agent permission check logic in AgentPanel to simplify condition Fix linting WIP Fix Unit tests WIP ESLint fixes eslint fix refactor: enhance isDuplicateVersion function in Agent model for improved comparison logic - Introduced handling for undefined/null values in array and object comparisons. - Normalized array comparisons to treat undefined/null as empty arrays. - Added deep comparison for objects and improved handling of primitive values. - Enhanced projectIds comparison to ensure consistent MongoDB ObjectId handling. refactor: remove redundant properties from IAgent interface in agent schema chore: update localization for agent detail component and clean up imports ci: update access middleware tests chore: remove unused PermissionTypes import from Role model ci: update AclEntry model tests ci: update button accessibility labels in AgentDetail tests refactor: update exhaustive dep. lint warning 🔧 fix: Fixed agent actions access feat: Add role-level permissions for agent sharing people picker - Add PEOPLE_PICKER permission type with VIEW_USERS and VIEW_GROUPS permissions - Create custom middleware for query-aware permission validation - Implement permission-based type filtering in PeoplePicker component - Hide people picker UI when user lacks permissions, show only public toggle - Support granular access: users-only, groups-only, or mixed search modes refactor: Replace marketplace interface config with permission-based system - Add MARKETPLACE permission type to handle marketplace access control - Update interface configuration to use role-based marketplace settings (admin/user) - Replace direct marketplace boolean config with permission-based checks - Modify frontend components to use marketplace permissions instead of interface config - Update agent query hooks to use marketplace permissions for determining permission levels - Add marketplace configuration structure similar to peoplePicker in YAML config - Backend now sets MARKETPLACE permissions based on interface configuration - When marketplace enabled: users get agents with EDIT permissions in dropdown lists (builder mode) - When marketplace disabled: users get agents with VIEW permissions in dropdown lists (browse mode) 🔧 fix: Redirect to New Chat if No Marketplace Access and Required Agent Name Placeholder (#8213) * Fix: Fix the redirect to new chat page if access to marketplace is denied * Fixed the required agent name placeholder --------- Co-authored-by: Atef Bellaaj <slalom.bellaaj@external.daimlertruck.com> chore: fix tests, remove unnecessary imports refactor: Implement permission checks for file access via agents - Updated `hasAccessToFilesViaAgent` to utilize permission checks for VIEW and EDIT access. - Replaced project-based access validation with permission-based checks. - Enhanced tests to cover new permission logic and ensure proper access control for files associated with agents. - Cleaned up imports and initialized models in test files for consistency. refactor: Enhance test setup and cleanup for file access control - Introduced modelsToCleanup array to track models added during tests for proper cleanup. - Updated afterAll hooks in test files to ensure all collections are cleared and only added models are deleted. - Improved consistency in model initialization across test files. - Added comments for clarity on cleanup processes and test data management. chore: Update Jest configuration and test setup for improved timeout handling - Added a global test timeout of 30 seconds in jest.config.js. - Configured jest.setTimeout in jestSetup.js to allow individual test overrides if needed. - Enhanced test reliability by ensuring consistent timeout settings across all tests. refactor: Implement file access filtering based on agent permissions - Introduced `filterFilesByAgentAccess` function to filter files based on user access through agents. - Updated `getFiles` and `primeFiles` functions to utilize the new filtering logic. - Moved `hasAccessToFilesViaAgent` function from the File model to permission services, adjusting imports accordingly - Enhanced tests to ensure proper access control and filtering behavior for files associated with agents. fix: make support_contact field a nested object rather than a sub-document refactor: Update support_contact field initialization in agent model - Removed handling for empty support_contact object in createAgent function. - Changed default value of support_contact in agent schema to undefined. test: Add comprehensive tests for support_contact field handling and versioning refactor: remove unused avatar upload mutation field and add informational toast for success chore: add missing SidePanelProvider for AgentMarketplace and organize imports fix: resolve agent selection race condition in marketplace HandleStartChat - Set agent in localStorage before newConversation to prevent useSelectorEffects from auto-selecting previous agent fix: resolve agent dropdown showing raw ID instead of agent info from URL - Add proactive agent fetching when agent_id is present in URL parameters - Inject fetched agent into agents cache so dropdowns display proper name/avatar - Use useAgentsMap dependency to ensure proper cache initialization timing - Prevents raw agent IDs from showing in UI when visiting shared agent links Fix: Agents endpoint renamed to "My Agent" for less confusion with the Marketplace agents. chore: fix ESLint issues and Test Mocks ci: update permissions structure in loadDefaultInterface tests - Refactored permissions for MEMORY and added new permissions for MARKETPLACE and PEOPLE_PICKER. - Ensured consistent structure for permissions across different types. feat: support_contact validation to allow empty email strings
This commit is contained in:
parent
66bd419baa
commit
949682ef0f
95 changed files with 3770 additions and 2728 deletions
|
|
@ -1,17 +1,31 @@
|
|||
const mongoose = require('mongoose');
|
||||
const { MongoMemoryServer } = require('mongodb-memory-server');
|
||||
const { checkAccess, generateCheckAccess } = require('./access');
|
||||
const { checkAccess, generateCheckAccess } = require('@librechat/api');
|
||||
const { PermissionTypes, Permissions } = require('librechat-data-provider');
|
||||
const { getRoleByName } = require('~/models/Role');
|
||||
const { Role } = require('~/db/models');
|
||||
|
||||
// Mock only the logger
|
||||
jest.mock('~/config', () => ({
|
||||
// Mock the logger from @librechat/data-schemas
|
||||
jest.mock('@librechat/data-schemas', () => ({
|
||||
...jest.requireActual('@librechat/data-schemas'),
|
||||
logger: {
|
||||
warn: jest.fn(),
|
||||
error: jest.fn(),
|
||||
info: jest.fn(),
|
||||
debug: jest.fn(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
// Mock the cache to use a simple in-memory implementation
|
||||
const mockCache = new Map();
|
||||
jest.mock('~/cache/getLogStores', () => {
|
||||
return jest.fn(() => ({
|
||||
get: jest.fn(async (key) => mockCache.get(key)),
|
||||
set: jest.fn(async (key, value) => mockCache.set(key, value)),
|
||||
clear: jest.fn(async () => mockCache.clear()),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
||||
let mongoServer;
|
||||
let req, res, next;
|
||||
|
|
@ -29,33 +43,86 @@ describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
|||
|
||||
beforeEach(async () => {
|
||||
await mongoose.connection.dropDatabase();
|
||||
mockCache.clear(); // Clear the cache between tests
|
||||
|
||||
// Create test roles
|
||||
await Role.create({
|
||||
name: 'user',
|
||||
permissions: {
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.BOOKMARKS]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.PROMPTS]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL]: false,
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.MEMORIES]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.UPDATE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.READ]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.OPT_OUT]: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.AGENTS]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: false,
|
||||
[Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL]: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.MULTI_CONVO]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.TEMPORARY_CHAT]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.RUN_CODE]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.WEB_SEARCH]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await Role.create({
|
||||
name: 'admin',
|
||||
permissions: {
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.BOOKMARKS]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.PROMPTS]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.MEMORIES]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.UPDATE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.READ]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.OPT_OUT]: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.AGENTS]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: true,
|
||||
[Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL]: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.MULTI_CONVO]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.TEMPORARY_CHAT]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.RUN_CODE]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.WEB_SEARCH]: { [Permissions.USE]: true },
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Create limited role with no AGENTS permissions
|
||||
await Role.create({
|
||||
name: 'limited',
|
||||
permissions: {
|
||||
// Explicitly set AGENTS permissions to false
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.AGENTS]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: false,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: false,
|
||||
[Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL]: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Has permissions for other types
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.PROMPTS]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
req = {
|
||||
user: { id: 'user123', role: 'user' },
|
||||
body: {},
|
||||
originalUrl: '/test',
|
||||
};
|
||||
res = {
|
||||
status: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
|
||||
|
|
@ -67,92 +134,127 @@ describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
|||
|
||||
describe('checkAccess', () => {
|
||||
test('should return false if user is not provided', async () => {
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess(null, PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.USE]);
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess({
|
||||
user: null,
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should return true if user has required permission', async () => {
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess(req.user, PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.USE]);
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req: {},
|
||||
user: { id: 'user123', role: 'user' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should return false if user lacks required permission', async () => {
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess(req.user, PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.CREATE]);
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req: {},
|
||||
user: { id: 'user123', role: 'user' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.CREATE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should return true if user has any of multiple permissions', async () => {
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess(req.user, PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [
|
||||
Permissions.USE,
|
||||
Permissions.CREATE,
|
||||
]);
|
||||
test('should return false if user has only some of multiple permissions', async () => {
|
||||
// User has USE but not CREATE, so should fail when checking for both
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req: {},
|
||||
user: { id: 'user123', role: 'user' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.CREATE, Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should return true if user has all of multiple permissions', async () => {
|
||||
// Admin has both USE and CREATE
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req: {},
|
||||
user: { id: 'admin123', role: 'admin' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.CREATE, Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should check body properties when permission is not directly granted', async () => {
|
||||
// User role doesn't have CREATE permission, but bodyProps allows it
|
||||
const bodyProps = {
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: ['agentId', 'name'],
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const checkObject = { agentId: 'agent123' };
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess(
|
||||
req.user,
|
||||
PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE],
|
||||
bodyProps,
|
||||
checkObject,
|
||||
);
|
||||
const req = { body: { id: 'agent123' } };
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req,
|
||||
user: { id: 'user123', role: 'user' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.UPDATE],
|
||||
bodyProps: {
|
||||
[Permissions.UPDATE]: ['id'],
|
||||
},
|
||||
checkObject: req.body,
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should return false if role is not found', async () => {
|
||||
req.user.role = 'nonexistent';
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess(req.user, PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.USE]);
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req: {},
|
||||
user: { id: 'user123', role: 'nonexistent' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should return false if role has no permissions for the requested type', async () => {
|
||||
await Role.create({
|
||||
name: 'limited',
|
||||
permissions: {
|
||||
// Explicitly set AGENTS permissions to false
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.AGENTS]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: false,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE]: false,
|
||||
[Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL]: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
// Has permissions for other types
|
||||
[PermissionTypes.PROMPTS]: {
|
||||
[Permissions.USE]: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req: {},
|
||||
user: { id: 'user123', role: 'limited' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
req.user.role = 'limited';
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await checkAccess(req.user, PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.USE]);
|
||||
expect(result).toBe(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should handle admin role with all permissions', async () => {
|
||||
req.user.role = 'admin';
|
||||
|
||||
const createResult = await checkAccess(req.user, PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [
|
||||
Permissions.CREATE,
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const createResult = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req: {},
|
||||
user: { id: 'admin123', role: 'admin' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.CREATE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(createResult).toBe(true);
|
||||
|
||||
const shareResult = await checkAccess(req.user, PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [
|
||||
Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL,
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const shareResult = await checkAccess({
|
||||
req: {},
|
||||
user: { id: 'admin123', role: 'admin' },
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(shareResult).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('generateCheckAccess', () => {
|
||||
test('should call next() when user has required permission', async () => {
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess(PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.USE]);
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess({
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
await middleware(req, res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
|
@ -160,7 +262,11 @@ describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should return 403 when user lacks permission', async () => {
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess(PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.CREATE]);
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess({
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.CREATE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
await middleware(req, res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
|
@ -175,11 +281,12 @@ describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
|||
[Permissions.CREATE]: ['agentId'],
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess(
|
||||
PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
[Permissions.CREATE],
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess({
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.CREATE],
|
||||
bodyProps,
|
||||
);
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
await middleware(req, res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
|
@ -187,10 +294,16 @@ describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should handle database errors gracefully', async () => {
|
||||
// Create a user with an invalid role that will cause getRoleByName to fail
|
||||
req.user.role = { invalid: 'object' }; // This will cause an error when querying
|
||||
// Mock getRoleByName to throw an error
|
||||
const mockGetRoleByName = jest
|
||||
.fn()
|
||||
.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Database connection failed'));
|
||||
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess(PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.USE]);
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess({
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName: mockGetRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
await middleware(req, res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
|
@ -203,11 +316,11 @@ describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
|||
test('should work with multiple permission types', async () => {
|
||||
req.user.role = 'admin';
|
||||
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess(PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [
|
||||
Permissions.USE,
|
||||
Permissions.CREATE,
|
||||
Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL,
|
||||
]);
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess({
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE, Permissions.CREATE, Permissions.SHARED_GLOBAL],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
await middleware(req, res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
|
@ -216,14 +329,16 @@ describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
|||
test('should handle missing user gracefully', async () => {
|
||||
req.user = null;
|
||||
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess(PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.USE]);
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess({
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
await middleware(req, res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(500);
|
||||
expect(res.json).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
||||
message: expect.stringContaining('Server error:'),
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(res.status).toHaveBeenCalledWith(403);
|
||||
expect(res.json).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ message: 'Forbidden: Insufficient permissions' });
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('should handle role with no AGENTS permissions', async () => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -240,7 +355,11 @@ describe('Access Middleware', () => {
|
|||
});
|
||||
req.user.role = 'noaccess';
|
||||
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess(PermissionTypes.AGENTS, [Permissions.USE]);
|
||||
const middleware = generateCheckAccess({
|
||||
permissionType: PermissionTypes.AGENTS,
|
||||
permissions: [Permissions.USE],
|
||||
getRoleByName,
|
||||
});
|
||||
await middleware(req, res, next);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(next).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue